Taxpayer Return on Investment in Florida Public Libraries Survey Results site navigation


Previous

Results of the REMI Analysis

Statewide
In Scenario 1, government spending that would have been directed to public libraries was redirected to other government spending activities. In Scenario 2, tax dollars are not collected and public library spending is redirected to consumers. Results are presented in 2008 dollars. Discounting analysis using a rate of 5% was used to present the economic impacts for years 2008 through 2040. Results for both scenarios are presented in Table 2 in comparison to results from 2004.

In Scenario 1, Gross Regional Product increases over $7 billion as a result of public library spending in Florida. This library-generated rise in state output increases wages by $15.2 billion and the number of jobs by 189,500 over the period. This in turn creates higher wage and salary earnings.

Table 2 - Results of REMI Analysis

 
Prior 2004 study findings based on redistrbuted government spending
Scenario 1
Redistributed library spending within the government
Scenario 2
Removed spending and reallocated it to consumers
Total Revenue Investment (TRI) (millions
$443
$661.5
$661.5
Gross Regional Product (net present value) (billions)
$4
$7.24
$14.6
Wages (net present value) (billions) (personal income)
$5.6
$15.2
$32.09
Number of jobs produced
68,700
189,500
455,413
Average jobs produced (divided by 32)
2,147
5,921
14,231
Gross Regional Product increase for every dollar spent (GRP/TRI)
$9.08
$10.94
$22.07
Income increase for every dollar spent (Wages/TRI)
$12.66
$22.97
$48.51
One job created by every dollar spent (TRI/Number of jobs produced)
$6,488
$3,491
$1452
Cost for users to use library (in time) (billions)
$1.83
$2.9
$2.9
Benefit to state in terms of wages (GRP + Wages - TRI) (billions)
$9.2
$21.8
$46
Benefit to cost ratio wages (Benefit to state/cost of users time)
5 to 1
7.5 to 1
15.8 to 1
Net benefit wages (Benefit to state-cost for users to use library) (billions)
$7.4
$18.9
$43.1
Gross Regional Product (billions)
$6.7
$14.96
$32.8
Benefit to cost ratio GRP (GRP/cost for users to use library)
3.7 to 1
5.1 to 1
11.3 to 1
Net benefit GRP (GRP - Cost for users to use library) (billions)
$4.9
$12
$40.2

The “benefits” to the State of Florida from a conservative perspective are defined as the total dollar amount leveraged by the investment in libraries based on all public funding sources. The “costs” to the State of Florida are defined as the initial public funding investment assumed to be redistributed to alternative government spending activities. Thus, if the funding for libraries were reallocated across Florida’s government sectors (Scenario 1), the state economy would see a net decline of $21.8 billion in terms of wages and 189,500 jobs in the 33-year period considered.

• Benefit to the state (in terms of wages) = $21.8 billion
• Cost to the state (in terms of public funding dollars and user time) = $2.9 billion
• B/CREMI = 7.5
Or:
• Benefit to the state (in terms of GRP or output) = $14.9 billion
• Cost to the state (in terms of public funding dollars and user time) = $2.9 billion
• B/CREMI = 5.1

The results of the economic analysis using the REMI model indicate that Florida public libraries contribute significantly to the Florida economy. The economic benefits from the expenditures made by the public libraries extend to job creation, generation of GRP and personal income. These benefits are substantially greater than the federal, state and local investment cost in public libraries.

To place the full value of public library spending in context, the $622 million of public library spending that occurred in 2008 generated over $1 billion in GRP. This amount was larger than the annual GRP of 26 of the 67 Florida counties.

Table 3 - Comparison of Public Library Generated GRP with Florida Counties

County Name
2008 GRP
  County Name
2008 GRP
Lafayette $
124,831,000
  Citrus $
2,451,449,000
Glades $
139,712,000
  Santa Rosa $
2,52,6042,000
Dixie $
198,020,000
  Hernando $
2,605,485,000
Calhoun $
207,261,000
  Clay $
3,103,414,000
Liberty $
216,753,000
  Charlotte $
3,177,848,000
Franklin $
227,992,000
  Monroe $
3,366,391,000
Gilchrist $
237,200,000
  Indian River $
3,979,188,000
Jefferson $
237,693,000
  St. Johns $
4,449,442,000
Gulf $
288,643,000
  Martin $
4,982,951,000
Holmes $
291,745,000
  Osceola $
5,060,401,000
Union $
307,202,000
  St. Lucie $
5,446,656,000
Hamilton $
316,945,000
  Lake $
5,913,078,000
Madison $
318,877,000
  Bay $
6,053,135,000
Wakulla $
413,592,000
  Pasco $
6,848,556,000
Washington $
436,190,000
  Marion $
7,327,275,000
Baker $
476,012,000
  Okaloosa $
8,762,548,000
Taylor $
537,363,000
  Manatee $
9,884,831,000
Bradford $
539,972,000
  Alachua $
10,053,414,000
Levy $
601,400,000
  Escambia $
11,243,247,000
Hardee $
620,918,000
  Volusia $
11,592,228,000
DeSoto $
747,420,000
  Collier $
11,758,452,000
Suwannee $
753,463,000
  Leon $
12,072,757,000
Okeechobee $
761,064,000
  Sarasota $
12,789,643,000
Hendry $
966,323,000
  Seminole $
15,651,569,000
Gadsden $
1,026,974,000
  Polk $
16,255,671,000
Jackson $
1,073,017,000
  Lee $
18,015,989,000
Florida Public Libraries $
1,076,140,000
  Brevard $
18,444,293,000
Flagler $
1,181,113,000
  Pinellas $
36,070,794,000
Putnam $
1,318,113,000
  Duval $
47,785,422,000
Walton $
1,423,502,000
  Palm Beach $
55,108,141,000
Sumter $
1,510,411,000
  Hillsborough $
59,347,846,000
Nassau $
1,581,294,000
  Orange $
60,661,076,000
Columbia $
1,711,173,000
  Broward $
69,503,075,000
Highlands $
1,899,886,000
  Miami-Dade $
103,816,165,000

Figures in 2004 dollars
Source: Woods & Poole Economics; REMI

County Level ROI and REMI Modeling Results
Using statewide per capita averages and the individual county REMI results from Scenario 1, the following reports show both an estimated ROI for each county’s libraries, as well as economic impact results for these libraries’ spending in each Florida county. The ROI figures range from $2.58 for each dollar invested in Lee County to $30.35 for each dollar in Holmes County. It must be emphasized that these are rough estimates only, and each individual library or library system would have to be studied separately in order to refine these figures. It should also be noted that these ROI figures do not necessarily reflect upon the efficiency of library operations in that a lower number is “bad” and a higher number “good.” Instead, they demonstrate that even a small investment that keeps a library in existence within a community, no matter that community’s size, yields an extremely high value to that community. As stated in Are You Worth It? What Return on Investment Can and Can’t Tell You About Your Library, “For ROI library metrics, the point isn’t that putting more and more money into libraries will yield ever increasing returns. The point is to show that libraries are providing value for the money that is invested in them. Those investments should be commensurate with the needs of the communities they serve.” Essentially libraries are a public service that, when provided with the right amount of resources and investment, produce significant returns to their community.

In terms of economic impact, the economic impact results reflect a positive net economic impact of libraries on the individual county economies for 66 of the 67 counties. The sole exception is Suwannee County. While the libraries there return $7.40 for each dollar invested, the structure of county economy in the REMI model is such that a redistribution of library spending to other government sectors does not result in decreased GRP.

It helped my husband find his current job. Helped us find a workable budget for our home use. Our children have spent countless hours borrowing books and DVDs. The library helped us feel a part of the community.
Escambia County Library User

County Data >>

 

 

 


 

For more information: info.Florida.gov.
Links to Site Authors
Haas Center at UWF State Library and Archives of Florida State Data County Data Definitions Home